Morrow County Sentinel.com

July 11 Letters to the Editor

To the Editor,

Reg­u­la­tions pro­tect Amer­i­cans from dan­ger­ous drugs, unsafe food, pol­luted air and water, and finan­cial shenanigans.

Back in 2008, the coun­try was founder­ing under a finan­cial col­lapse caused in large part by decep­tive prac­tices in the under-regulated bank­ing and mort­gage indus­tries, with greed push­ing more and more shaky practices.

When he came into office, Pres­i­dent Obama pro­posed and the 111th Con­gress approved the Con­sumer Finan­cial Pro­tec­tion Bureau (CFPB). Its pur­pose? To pro­tect Americans.

Accord­ing to Richard Cor­dray, the bureau chief, the bureau’s juris­dic­tion includes banks, credit unions, secu­ri­ties firms, pay­day lenders, mortgage-servicing oper­a­tions, fore­clo­sure relief ser­vices, debt col­lec­tors and other finan­cial com­pa­nies, and its most press­ing con­cerns are mort­gages, credit cards and stu­dent loans.

Repub­li­cans fought the CFPB’s estab­lish­ment, the selec­tion of a bureau chief, and its fund­ing, scream­ing “reg­u­la­tions.” These reg­u­la­tions pro­tect us, you and me, from peo­ple and busi­nesses that want to get rich by deceiv­ing us. I’m grate­ful to a pres­i­dent who puts cit­i­zens ahead of unbri­dled capitalism.

Jill Grubb, Ben­ning­ton West Township

Dear Edi­tor,

America’s so called safety net is no longer a safety net, it has become a ham­mock for the lazy, unwill­ing and spoiled. With the supreme court’s (yes I unca­p­atilized it on pur­pose) rul­ing on Oba­macare, you, the lazy able bod­ied enti­tle­ment group (“LABEG”) are going to find out rather quickly, I imag­ine, that the work­ing class cit­i­zens aren’t going to pay your way any longer. (II Thes­sa­lo­ni­ans 3:10) The work­ing class cit­i­zens don’t owe you a liv­ing, they never have. And the work­ing class cit­i­zens are going to see their taxes increase tremen­dously under the oppres­sive Oba­macare enti­tle­ment pro­gram. The work­ing class isn’t going to be so will­ing to con­tinue to pay for your food, cloth­ing and shel­ter because, they just won’t have enough money to go around. So LABEG just a lit­tle fore­warn­ing, you might actu­ally want go out and get a job. Then, you too can also pay the oppres­sive taxes that Oba­macare has placed on every­one with this new enti­tle­ment pro­gram. Let me out­line just a few of the new taxes you might not be aware of: (i) a 2.3% tax on med­ical device mak­ers which will raise the price of every pace­maker, pros­thetic limb, stent, and oper­at­ing table; (ii) cur­rently, Amer­i­cans are allowed to deduct med­ical expenses on taxes if the costs exceed 7.5%, the new law increases that to 10%; (iii) $2,500 cap on Flex­i­ble Spend­ing Accounts; (iv) 20% cap­i­tal gains increase on all Amer­i­cans in 2013 and sur­tax rate to 39.6% (i.e., an esti­mated $123 bil­lion out of tax­pay­ers’ pock­ets over 10 years); (v) Medicare pay­roll tax hike from 1.45% to 2.35%; and (vi) of course the Indi­vid­ual Man­date Excise Tax start­ing in 2014, any­one not buy­ing “qual­i­fy­ing” health insur­ance (that includes you LABEG) must pay a sur­tax that goes up each year until 2016. Oh, Oba­macare does have Inde­pen­dent Pay­ment Advi­sory Boardswhose sole pur­pose is to “keep costs down” for the gov­ern­ment by actu­ally deny­ing care via price con­trols and typ­i­cally inef­fi­cient bureau­cracy. Sarah Palin’s death pan­els do exist. So for those of you who like this new enti­tle­ment pro­gram, you either thought you were giv­ing away some­one else’s money, you were taken in by a snake oil sales­man, or you just don’t care if this county goes the way of Greece. For those that do care, the only way to stop this, is to turn this coun­try back to its found­ing prin­ci­ples and to bring God back into our every­day lives; oth­er­wise we will lose this great coun­try. (Psalm 146)

Cindy Fricke, Mt. Gilead

Dear Edi­tor,

The Sex­ual Rev­o­lu­tion dawned in the 1960’s with the inven­tion of the birth con­trol pill. Many Catholics were chaf­ing under the Church’s pro­hi­bi­tion of arti­fi­cial con­tra­cep­tion. The Vat­i­can appointed a com­mis­sion to reex­am­ine the issue. It was widely hoped and expected that the Church would reverse its ancient pol­icy but, in a con­tro­ver­sial 1968 Encycli­cal let­ter, Humanae Vitae, Pope Paul VI announced his deci­sion to uphold this doc­trine. In response, Cana­dian bish­ops issued a state­ment affirm­ing each Catholic’s right to fol­low his or her own con­science when decid­ing whether or not to prac­tice arti­fi­cial con­tra­cep­tion. Amer­i­can bish­ops decided to let this “don’t ask – don’t tell” pol­icy take effect in the United States. The men­tion of arti­fi­cial con­tra­cep­tion in Sun­day ser­mons and, one might sus­pect, in the con­fes­sional became extremely rare. As the decades rolled on, the size of U.S. Catholic fam­i­lies shrank.

The bish­ops were silent as twenty-eight states passed laws requir­ing Catholic orga­ni­za­tions to pro­vide their employ­ees with insur­ance which included con­tra­cep­tion cov­er­age. They uttered no com­plaint as more and more Catholic uni­ver­si­ties and Catholic hos­pi­tals began to offer sim­i­lar ben­e­fits to their employ­ees. But, when the Depart­ment of Health and Human Ser­vices decreed that arti­fi­cial con­tra­cep­tion cov­er­age be made avail­able to women through their employer-based health care insur­ance, sev­eral bish­ops headed for the near­est micro­phones to rail against this “assault on Free­dom of Reli­gion.” In view of their four decades of silence, this sud­den out­cry is hyp­o­crit­i­cal, even farcical.

In a recent let­ter to Catholics in the Colum­bus dio­cese, Bishop Fred­er­ick F. Camp­bell wrote: “almost all employ­ers will beforced to offer their employ­ees’ health cov­er­age that includes ster­il­iza­tion, abortion-inducing drugs and con­tra­cep­tion. Almost all health insur­ers will be forced to include those ‘ser­vices’ in the health poli­cies they write. And almost all indi­vid­u­als will be forced to buy that cov­er­age as part of their poli­cies.” These charges are false.

The employer will not be required to pro­vide, pay for or refer for con­tra­cep­tive cov­er­age. Cov­er­age will be offered to women by their employ­ers’ insur­ance com­pany directly, with no role for employ­ers who oppose con­tra­cep­tion. The pre­ven­tive care does not include abor­ti­fa­cient drugs. While it is true that insur­ers will be required to offer con­tra­cep­tive cov­er­age, 89 per­cent of insured plans already cover con­tra­cep­tives. A 2010 sur­vey found that 85 per­cent of large employ­ers and 62 per­cent of small employ­ers already offer con­tra­cep­tive cov­er­age. This cov­er­age is cost neu­tral because it saves money for the insur­ance com­pany by keep­ing women healthy and avoids spend­ing on other health ser­vices. Finally, under the Afford­able Care Act women will receive con­tra­cep­tive cov­er­age free of charge.

This blus­ter over Reli­gious Free­dom isn’t about con­tra­cep­tion. It’s an attempt by Amer­i­can Catholic bish­ops to use an old wedge issue to fur­ther their own right-wing polit­i­cal agenda. And, of course, they want to reclaim their author­ity to act as arbiters of Amer­i­can sex­ual moral­ity, author­ity they for­feited by their cover-ups in the con­tin­u­ing priest sex­ual abuse scandal.

Edward Tay­lor, Mount Gilead

www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/ 02/10/fact-sheet-women-s-preventive-services-and-religious-institutions

www.healthcare.gov/news/factsheets/2011/08/womensprevention08012011a.html

www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=HHS_FRDOC_0001-0443Dear

Edi­tor,

June 28 was a great day if you enjoy hav­ing your income tax dou­bled and hav­ing the Amer­ica health care sys­tem ruined. The only thing Jus­tice Roberts proved was he does not under­stand our sys­tem of jus­tice. He is to rule on the law as pre­sented to him not change the law then rule as he did in this case. He did two things that day he vio­lated the con­sti­tu­tion, and fixed it so the con­gress can tax us for every­thing we do or not do in every day life.

Any­one that thinks the health care reform is great had bet­ter look at the true facts of what the law will do to our qual­ity of life. The old say­ing of “if it sounds to good to be true it prob­a­bly is” fits this law to a tee. Like every­thing else Pres­i­dent Obama has done it will do noth­ing more than put more lim­its what we the cit­i­zens of this coun­try will be allowed to do when it comes to free­dom of choice.

So what does it mean to the peo­ple of Mor­row County. You can keep your cur­rent health plan if you can afford it because now that no one can be refused cov­er­age the cost to providers will now increase so guess who gets to cover the increase in cost? It is also nice no one can be denied health cov­er­age because of “pre­ex­ist­ing” con­di­tions. The gov­ern­ment just decides you are not worth the cost to treat your con­di­tion so you are given med­ica­tion to ease your pain and suf­fer­ing until you die. This also is the case if you need any type of med­ical treat­ment and you are over a cer­tain age you will be given med­ica­tion to ease your pain and suf­fer­ing until you die because it would be cheaper than the cost of the med­ical treat­ment or surgery you need. This is also how the pre­scrip­tion drug gap for Medicare ben­e­fits for those over 65 years of age will be cov­ered. If your med­ica­tion is too expen­sive you will be given med­ica­tion to ease your pain until you pass away.

True we will no longer have to worry about los­ing our heath cov­er­age if we lose our job because employ­ers will no longer be pro­vid­ing health cov­er­age for their employ­ees because it will be cheaper for them to pay the tax penalty than the monthly health pre­mium for each employee. Which means every one will be pay­ing to be on the gov­ern­ment health plan because it will be cheaper than any health plan any pri­vate insur­ance com­pany can pro­vide. Oh I for­got there is not to be a sin­gle health care plan it is just going to work out that way.

Obama care is sim­ple pay only for the young because they will be liv­ing longer than an older per­son unless they have an untreat­able con­di­tion then they will be treated like any older per­son just given med­ica­tion to ease suf­fer­ing and pain until they die. You need only to read the Obama Health Plan to find out all of the true facts about how bad it is for Amer­ica. Yes the gov­ern­ment will now decide who now get what med­ical treat­ment and who will not.

How many times have you had to buy some­thing pay on it for two years before you were allowed to use it well that’s is what now has hap­pen we get to pay, with the increase in our income tax, for this new health care sys­tem, for the next two years before we can use it. It is the largest income tax hike in the his­tory of the United States but the Pres­i­dent does not want that fact becom­ing pub­lic knowl­edge until after the elec­tion this Novem­ber, which is why he is upset with Judge Roberts call­ing it a tax. How bad is it going to be just for exam­ple now the per per­son Medicare Insur­ance Pre­mium will increase from the present monthly fee of $96.40, ris­ing to: $104.20 in 2012, $120.20 in 2013, and $247.00 in 2014. These are pro­vi­sions incor­po­rated in the Oba­macare Leg­is­la­tion, to pur­posely delayed and cover up more of the truth of his not free health plan so not to hurt his 2012 Re-Election Cam­paign. The gov­ern­ment has now started hir­ing more IRS agents to make sure every­one legally liv­ing in the United States is, and will be, pay­ing their income tax to cover this great health care plan.

Duane Rasey, Con­gress Township

Taylor Kaser Posted by on Jul 10 2012. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS Feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

1 Comment for “July 11 Letters to the Editor”

  1. chris gabrelcik

    Dear Edi­tor,
    I would like to address the let­ter writ­ten by Ed Tay­lor on 7/11. Mr. Tay­lor tries to make the point that the Amer­i­can Bish­ops do not have the right to chal­lenge “Obamacare’s” man­date that every employer pay for arti­fi­cial birth con­trol. Ed based this on the fact they didn’t preach about it enough, and some of them were silent about the issue in the 60’s and 70’s. This is akin to claim­ing that the State High­way Patrol doesn’t have the right to give tick­ets because they let peo­ple go 70 mph in a 65 mph zone. They appar­ently don’t care if you speed and it’s now hyp­o­crit­i­cal to give a per­son a ticket for going 75 mph. The truth is the Catholic Church is a fam­ily. Priests and Bish­ops are not admin­is­tra­tors try­ing to con­trol peo­ple, they are par­ents pro­tect­ing their chil­dren from evil. Another good exam­ple is, I set a bed­time for my chil­dren at 9:00 but I occa­sion­ally let them stay up to 11:00. But then the gov­ern­ment steps in and says I am required by law to let them stay up until 11:00 every night. The gov­ern­ment would be over­step­ping its bounds.
    Mr. Tay­lor falsely states that the Church won’t have pay for arti­fi­cial con­tra­cep­tion. Obama changed the law to put the bur­den of pay­ment on the insur­ance com­pany instead of the employer but what about self insured dio­ce­ses? Their money comes directly from dona­tions and will now be forced to pay for arti­fi­cial con­tra­cep­tion which goes directly against their beliefs. Whether you choose to believe the Catholic Church is right or wrong in their belief, it’s still wrong to force them to pay for some­thing they believe is evil.
    He then went on to assert the Catholic Church is a right wing orga­ni­za­tion try­ing to con­trol peo­ple. Most peo­ple con­sider the Catholic Church a mod­er­ate or lib­eral orga­ni­za­tion. Their stance on cap­i­tal pun­ish­ment, social jus­tice and like usu­ally aligns with the left more than the right. The ques­tion is “Why is the Obama Admin­is­tra­tion forc­ing this down our throats?” They could eas­ily allow a reli­gious exemp­tion but they won’t. The only log­i­cal expla­na­tion is that they want to break the Catholic Church. I have not heard of a sin­gle Chris­t­ian or Jew­ish leader that sup­ports this gov­ern­ment infringe­ment on reli­gious rights. Lead­ers from all denom­i­na­tions have spo­ken out against the law because they under­stand that this is just the begin­ning of the gov­ern­ment infring­ing on reli­gious rights. If this gets by then every reli­gious free­dom will be fair game.
    Every Chris­t­ian denom­i­na­tion con­sid­ered arti­fi­cial con­tra­cep­tion sin­ful at one time, but over time, they all even­tu­ally caved to their con­gre­ga­tions. The Catholic Church has held fast to their val­ues. Their beliefs haven’t changed in 2000 years, our abil­ity to fol­low them has. It is our duty as cit­i­zens to pro­tect all reli­gious lib­erty, whether we believe it or not. If the gov­ern­ment made a law forc­ing Jew­ish and Mus­lim peo­ple to buy pork every week I would be just as appalled. And believe it or not, with the com­merce clause and the new Supreme Court rul­ing they could legally do that. They could always make the argu­ment that they don’t have to eat the pork, only buy it, which is essen­tially what they told the Catholic Church.
    I would urge every­one to do every­thing they can to stop this infringe­ment on our rights before it is too late.

Comments are closed

Search Archive

Search by Date
Search by Category
Search with Google

Open M-F 8am to 5pm | 419-946-3010 | 46 S. Main Street, Mt. Gilead, Ohio 43338

We use third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our Web site. For more information click here.
Click on the following for legal information: Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Copyright © 2010 - 2012, Ohio Community Media